![]() ![]() The civil penalty appears to relate to highly technical rules about how campaign spending through an intermediary should be reported, and not to delve into issues around the legality (or veracity) of the dossier. The agency routinely does not comment on specific allegations or enforcement measures. The FEC has roughly 30 days to make it so, and an agency spokesperson declined to comment beyond noting that time frame for closed complaints. The agency’s full factual and legal analysis is not yet publicly available. The agreements read that the party and campaign do “not concede, but will not further contest the Commission’s finding,” in order to settle the matters and not incur more legal costs.ĭaniel Wessel, a DNC spokesperson, said in a statement that “we settled aging and silly complaints from the 2016 election about ‘purpose descriptions’ in our FEC report,” while a spokesperson for Clinton’s office did not respond to a request for comment. In the agreements, the DNC and Clinton campaign contend that they believed they properly disclosed the spending. ![]() 16 by Graham Wilson, an attorney who was formerly at Perkins Coie and is now at the Elias Law Group. ![]() The pair of agreements were signed for the Democratic groups on Feb. The conciliation agreements found “probable cause to believe” that both the campaign and national party “misreport the purpose of certain disbursements” when they said certain payments to Perkins Coie were for legal fees. The Steele dossier, which was first made public when BuzzFeed News published it in January 2017, contained a variety of accurate, inaccurate, unproven and sometimes salacious allegations about ties between Russia and Donald Trump, as well as others in his orbit. POLITICO independently obtained a second, and similar, letter the agency sent to the CLC. ![]() Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller interviewed Steele in early October.The FEC conciliation agreements were made public Wednesday after the Coolidge Reagan Foundation first shared a response letter from the agency with the Washington Examiner. Both Steele and Fusion GPS representatives met with Congressional investigators in August. The Steele dossier has been repeatedly dismissed as fiction by Trump and his allies, but it has recently become an element in the investigation of possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Get CEO Daily, Fortune’s technology newsletter. Reports from Christopher Steele, the former British spy who compiled to dossier, began in June of 2016. Those groups appear to have funded Fusion’s continued Trump research, in a deal brokered by an affiliated law firm, from April of 2016 until just before election day. In its statement, however, the Free Beacon claimed that none of the research it directly commissioned appeared in the Steele dossier, which included claims that the Russian government had collected compromising material on Trump, including salacious sexual “kompromat.” The Free Beacon ended its relationship with Fusion GPS as it became clear that Trump would secure the Republican nomination.įusion GPS then reportedly approached the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |